Rethinking Learning through AI-Powered Digital Note-Taking in Bangladeshi Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70454/IJMRE.60306Keywords:
AI-Powered Digital Note-Taking, Large Language Models, Higher Education in Bangladesh, Digital Learning, Learning StrategiesAbstract
This study explores how AI-powered digital note-taking is reshaping learning strategies in Bangladeshi higher education. Focusing on emerging tools such as Chat GPT, Google Gemini, Notebook LM, and Notion AI, the study examines the transition from traditional note-taking practices toward intelligent knowledge management systems. The paper analyses how AI-assisted note-taking supports knowledge construction, personalized learning, academic productivity, and information organization while also addressing challenges related to digital inequality, AI dependency, academic integrity, and ethical use. A qualitative theoretical research methodology is adopted, based on the analysis of existing scholarly literature, theories, and research on digital learning and artificial intelligence in education. The study is intended for higher education students, educators, and researchers interested in technology-supported learning practices. The findings suggest that AI-powered note-taking can enhance learning strategies when integrated with critical thinking and responsible academic practices.
References
[1] Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning (2nd Ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/
[2] Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
[3] Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating? Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT.Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Https
[4] Davenport, T. H., &Prussic, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
[5] Downs, S. (2012). Connectives and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. National Research Council Canada.
[6] Hassan, S. R., NazimNira, T., Jabir, S., RhamanImon, I., & Das, S. C. (2026). From ASTP and ALM to Digital Language Learning: The Evolution of Language Teaching. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. Https
[7] Holmes, W., Bialy, M., &Fidel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
[8] Canseco, E., Sesser, K., Küchemann, S., Banner, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Guinean, S., Hüllermeier, E., Kusch, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaela, T., Endanger, K., Pfeiffer, J., Piquet, O., Sailor, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Canseco, G. (2023). Catgut for good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[9] Kieran, K. A. (1985). Learning from a Lecture: An Investigation of Note Taking, Review, and Attendance at a Lecture. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(2), 73–77.
[10] Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Association Press.
[11] Lucking, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., &Forcer, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
[12] Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd Ed.). Cambridge University Press. Https
[13] Mueller, P. A., &Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen is Mightier than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
[14] Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hub, X., Downier, J. S., & Chan, S. W. (2021). A Review of AI Teaching and Learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6455–6480.
[15] Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.
[16] Pilot, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive Effort during Note Taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312.https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086
[17] Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
[18] Siemens, G. (2005). Connectives: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
[19] Seller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[20] Seller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &Peas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
[21] van Disk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press.
[22] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
[23] Williamson, B., &Etymon, R. (2020). Historical Threads, Missing Links, and Future Directions in AI in Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
[24] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., &Governor, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sharif Ratul Hassan, Tanzina Nazim Nira (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the term's of the Creative Common Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
