Improving Instrument Landing System (ILS) Precision using Magneto-Gyroscope-Based Sensor Fusion

shashank Bachahalli; Sathvik  S; S Vaishnavi

doi:10.70454/IJMRE.2026.60105

Authors

shashank Bachahalli Electronics And Communication Engineering Bms College Of Engineering Bangalore, India Author
Sathvik S Electronics And Communication Engineering Bms College Of Engineering Bangalore, India Author
Vaishnavi Electronics And Communication Engineering Bms College Of Engineering Bangalore, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70454/IJMRE.2026.60105

Keywords:

Instrument landing system, electromagnetic interference (EMI), magneto gyroscopes, fused sensors, sensor fusion, Aircraft navigation

Abstract

The Instrument Landing System (ILS), however, is a well-established but expensive and infrastructure dependent aviation support system that must also battle electromagnetic interference (EMI). This paper presents a portable infrastructure free system using embedded systems and sensor fusion which replicates ILS functionality. An MPU-6050 gyroscope and LIS3MDL magnetometer coupled to an STM32F103 microcontroller allow the system to compute its real-time attitude, as well as deviation from a virtual glide slope centerline and runway centerline. This is aided by a complementary filter which helps to combine sensor data that will reduce gyroscope drift and noise from externals like magnetic interference. The MCU-That-Wals PCB was designed in Altium and KiCad and is small enough to use EMI reducing layout practices, supporting UART, I2C and optional Wi-Fi Telemetry. Firmware includes drivers, fusion logic, and RTC synchronized data logging. Obtaining valid responses confirms successful sensor integration and tracking orientation. Some target applications are UAVs, urban air mobility and remote landings. In the future GNSS, advanced filtering, autopilot integration and real-time dashboards will also be added leading to an enabling technology for cost effective, scalable and fully autonomous landing systems.

References

[1]. Durairasu, “The Future of Aviation: Unleashing New Age Fused Sensor For ILS,” Aug. 4, 2023.

[2]. J. Smith and R. Brown, "Advancements in Sensor Fusion for Aviation Navigation Systems," Aerospace Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 201–210, 2021.

[3]. J. Williams, "ILS and the Impact of EMI," Aerospace Research, vol. 22, no. 1, 2021.

[4]. Y. Wu and L. Pei, "Gyroscope Calibration via Magnetometer," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 5269–5275, Aug. 15, 2017.

[5]. M. Zhou, "Hybrid Sensor Fusion for Aircraft Guidance," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 28, no. 5, 2019.

[6]. T. Lee, "Advances in Aviation Instrumentation," Proc. AIAA Conf., 2020. A. Kumar and B. Singh, "Electromagnetic Interference in Aviation Systems," IEEE Trans. Aerospace, vol. 55, no. 4, 2019.

[7]. M. Zhu, Y. Wu and W. Yu, "An Efficient Method for Gyroscope-Aided Full Magnetometer Calibration," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 6355–6361, Aug. 1, 2019.

[8]. K. Patel, "Microcontroller-Based Sensor Calibration Techniques," Embedded Systems Journal, 2017. S. A. Ludwig and A. R. Jiménez, "Optimization of gyroscope and accelerometer/magnetometer portion of basic AHRS," Proc. IEEE INERTIAL, Lake Como, Italy, 2018, pp. 1–4.

[9]. X. Cui, Y. Li and Q. Wang, "Enhanced Vehicle Heading Estimation for Magnetometer/Gyroscope Integration With Random Magnetic InterferenceDetection Based on Pearson Correlation Coefficient," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 73, pp. 1–16, 2024, Art no. 9504116.

[10]. S. Mischie, "On Calibration of the Magnetometer with the Help of the Gyroscope," Proc. 2024 IEEE 30th Int. Symp. Design and Tech. in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), Sibiu, Romania, 2024, pp. 158–162.

[11]. Y. Yang, "An Improved FastEuler-DLKF Small-UAV AHRS Algorithm," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2002.08429, 2020.

[12]. S. Rodríguez-Martínez and G. Troni, "Towards a Factor Graph-Based Method Using Angular Rates for Full Magnetometer Calibration and Gyroscope Bias Estimation," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2410.13827, 2024.

[13]. W. Nie, J. Chen, Y. Li, and X. Wang, "Improving the Underwater Navigation Performance of an IMU with Acoustic Long Baseline Calibration," Satellite Navigation, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023.

[14]. S. Li, Y. Niu, C. Feng, H. Liu, D. Zhang, and H. Qin, "An Onsite Calibration Method for MEMS-IMU in Building Mapping Fields," Sensors, vol. 19, no. 19, p. 4150, 2019.

[15]. A. Sabzevari, R. Yazdi, and M. Malekzadeh, "INS/GPS Sensor Fusion Based on Adaptive Fuzzy EKF with Sensitivity to Disturbances," IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1586–1597, 2021.

[16]. V. V. Voronov, A. N. Nikiforov, and S. A. Stepanov, "Calibration of a Precision SINS IMU and Construction of IMU-Bound Orthogonal Frame," Gyroscopy and Navigation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 187–196, 2016.